COP28 Controversy: Conference President Rejects Climate Alarmism – Unraveling the Debate


At the cop28 conference, President Sultan Al Jaber’s dismissal of climate alarmism has ignited a significant controversy. Leading the 2023 UN climate summit, Al Jaber boldly asserted that there is “no science” supporting the imperative to phase out fossil fuels, categorically rejecting participation in what he deems “alarmist” discussions. 

“I accepted to come to this meeting to have a sober and mature conversation. I’m not in any way signing up to any discussion that is alarmist. There is no science out there, or no scenario out there, that says that the phase-out of fossil fuel is what’s going to achieve 1.5C,” Al Jaber said.

This stance has reverberated through the climate science community, raising concerns among scientists and advocates. As the UAE’s energy tsar, Al Jaber’s position holds weight, impacting ongoing climate discourse. 

The rejection challenges established scientific consensus, and the implications for cop28 discussions are profound, potentially hindering global efforts to address climate change. Al Jaber has called for collaboration, but the disagreement on fundamental climate science may overshadow cooperative solutions.

In the dynamic landscape of cop28, divergent stances are emerging, shedding light on significant divides in the global climate discourse. 

Tensions flared over calls for a comprehensive ban on fossil fuels, laying bare the clash between economic considerations and environmental imperatives. The intricacies of climate finance became a focal point, as nations grappled with differing perspectives on who qualifies as a donor and recipient, impeding crucial advancements. 

Geopolitical frictions, notably in the context of the Gaza conflict and U.S.-China rivalry, cast a looming shadow on collaborative efforts. Lingering disputes on financial commitments and concerns about the COP28 chair’s industry affiliations add layers of complexity, underscoring the formidable task of forging a unified front against climate change.

President Sultan Al Jaber’s rejection of a full ban on fossil fuels significantly impacts the ongoing climate discourse, particularly in the context of cop28. His stance, divergent from UN Secretary General António Guterres, who advocates for ceasing all fossil fuel use to save the planet, creates a clear rift. 


This disagreement underscores the challenge of forging a unified approach to combat climate change. Calls for Al Jaber’s resignation, especially from groups like PACJA, signal a loss of confidence in his leadership and intensify concerns about impartiality. 

The discord may jeopardize the effectiveness of cop28 and strain international climate agreements, hindering progress toward crucial emission reduction targets.

The rejection of climate alarmism, reflected in the reluctance to fully embrace a phase-out of unabated fossil fuels, may signal a shift in future climate narratives. This skepticism could influence discussions around the urgency of drastic measures, impacting public perception and policy decisions. 

Within cop28, the dynamics are likely to be complex. The EU’s push for a global fossil fuel phase-out contrasts with resistance, setting the stage for intense negotiations. As the Global Stocktake reveals the imperative to cut emissions by 22 gigatons before 2030, debates over decarbonization solutions, including green hydrogen and CCUS, will intensify.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *