Western Lenders Face Accusations of Bias in Africa’s Energy

The African Energy Chamber (AEC) is protesting what it deems discriminatory practices by Western lenders toward Africa’s oil and gas projects.

The AEC argues that these lenders are engaging in “financial apartheid” by refusing to support the continent’s energy infrastructure, hindering its economic development and perpetuating energy poverty.

Nj Ayuk, the executive chairman of the AEC, has criticized the global north’s reluctance to finance African oil and gas projects.

He asserts that this discrimination is not only unfair but also counterproductive, as it prevents Africa from transitioning from energy poverty to energy security.

Ayuk emphasizes that Africa’s energy needs are unique and require tailored solutions, not a one-size-fits-all approach imposed by Western financial institutions.

The AEC is now considering legal action against the discriminatory funding practices. In collaboration with other African energy lobbies, governments, and project sponsors, the organization is exploring the possibility of a joint lawsuit against the banks involved.

While the specific details of the legal strategy are still being finalized, the AEC is determined to challenge the double standards and unfair treatment faced by African energy projects.

One notable example of this discrimination is the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (Eacop) project, which has been struggling to secure financing from Western lenders.

More on Oil and Gas:

EPRA Maintains VAT on Fuel Despite Court Ruling and Rising Prices

Despite its estimated cost of $5 billion, the project has faced delays due to the lack of debt financing from international banks.

As a result, the project’s shareholders have had to inject more equity funds this year, delaying its implementation and hindering the region’s economic development.

Furthermore, the AEC has highlighted the double standards in the treatment of natural gas. While natural gas is considered a fossil fuel in Africa, it is often viewed as a cleaner alternative to coal in Europe and other parts of the world.

This discrepancy, according to Ayuk, is a clear example of discrimination and is both “outrageous” and “unacceptable.” The AEC argues that this double standard undermines Africa’s efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources and perpetuates the continent’s dependence on fossil fuels.

The African energy lobby argues that the withdrawal of funding from fossil fuel projects disproportionately affects African nations, which are already grappling with economic challenges.

They contend that such actions exacerbate poverty, inequality, and political instability, undermining the continent’s overall development.

By taking legal action, the AEC hopes to send a strong message to Western lenders and promote a more equitable and inclusive approach to financing energy development in Africa.

The organization believes that by challenging discriminatory practices and advocating for fair treatment, it can help to create a more just and sustainable energy future for the continent.