In the evolving landscape of 2026, renewable energy has moved from a developmental goal to the primary engine of rural African economies.
Among the various applications of Productive Use Leveraging Solar Energy (PULSE), solar water pumping (SWP) in the horticulture sector stands out as the most economically transformative technology, offering some of the fastest returns on investment in the agricultural world.
The Sub-One-Year Return
For smallholder farmers defined as those managing fewer than five acres, the financial case for solar irrigation is exceptionally strong. Data established in the early 2020s remains the gold standard for understanding this ROI: an investment in a small, over-the-counter solar pump costing approximately 750–850 can pay for itself in less than one year.
This rapid payback period is achieved primarily by breaking the cycle of rain-fed agriculture. In regions like Uganda, standard farming relies on two rainy seasons, leaving the land idle or unproductive during dry spells. By utilising SWPs, horticulturalists can extend their growing season into these dry periods, allowing for more than three crop cycles per year.
Because the market supply of fresh produce drops during the dry season, these farmers access significantly higher market prices, effectively doubling or tripling their revenue per harvest.
High-Value Crops: The Tomato Benchmark
The payback period is highly sensitive to the type of crop being irrigated. Financial modelling shows that horticulture is the ideal use case for solar irrigation, whereas staple crops like maize often fail to provide a viable return.
For instance, a medium-scale SWP project (designed for roughly 20 acres and costing about $24,000 including drip irrigation equipment) used for tomato production can pay back its entire capital expenditure in less than a single harvest.
Tomatoes are highly responsive to consistent water supply and command high market values. In contrast, a similar system used for coffee may take up to five years to pay back, while irrigation for maize is frequently deemed not financially feasible because the low commodity value cannot offset the equipment costs.
Displacing Diesel: A 3.6-Year Payback
For more established commercial farms that already utilise mechanised irrigation, the payback period is calculated differently. Many of these farms originally relied on petrol or diesel-powered generators. In these “brownfield” scenarios, the primary benefit of solar is the elimination of fuel and maintenance costs.
Read Also: Algeria’s 1,480 MW Solar Boom: A Wake-Up Call for Africa’s Energy Ambitions
Analysis of these transitions shows that solar PV equipment replacing a diesel generator typically yields a payback period of 3.4 to 3.6 years. While the upfront cost of solar is higher than a diesel genset, the long-term savings are undeniable; high-quality solar panels and inverters often have a useful life exceeding ten years, providing nearly seven years of “free” energy after the initial payback is achieved.
Overcoming the Affordability Gap
Despite these lucrative returns, a significant hurdle remains: the “affordability gap”. In 2026, just as in the early 2020s, a 700–800 pump still represents eight to nine times the average monthly income of many rural households.
To bridge this, the market has matured to rely on Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) models and results-based financing. By allowing farmers to pay in instalments that match their harvest cycles, the “typical” payback period becomes a manageable operational expense rather than a prohibitive upfront cost.
For investors, the message is clear: solar irrigation in horticulture is the most profitable decision an African smallholder can make.
This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation. This is an adaptation of an original work by The World Bank. Views and opinions expressed in the adaptation are the sole responsibility of the author(s) of the adaptation and are not endorsed by The World Bank.
By Thuita Gatero, Managing Editor, Africa Digest News. He specializes in conversations around data centers, AI, cloud infrastructure, and energy.